Yes—there are multiple examples from the 1970s onward where major technological shifts (new languages, platforms, or devices) disrupted the workforce and led to layoffs, retraining pressures, or displacement of thousands of programmers and IT staff. While layoffs were not always framed strictly as "programmers losing jobs," technology transitions often caused large groups of workers in IT departments, government agencies, and corporations to become redundant or face massive retraining needs. Below is a timeline with notable examples:
1970s–1980s: Mainframe → Minicomputer → Desktop Microcomputer
- Mainframe COBOL & Assembly programmers displaced by minicomputers and later PCs
- As DEC’s VAX, UNIX systems, and later IBM PCs spread, many organizations reduced mainframe operations.
- Thousands of COBOL/assembly programmers in government and corporations faced layoffs or forced retraining as IT shifted toward distributed computing.
- Notable Example: Banks and insurance firms in the U.S. and Europe downsized mainframe staff as client/server architectures emerged in the 1980s.
1980s–1990s: Proprietary Languages → Open Systems
- Proprietary 4GLs & mainframe languages (RPG, PL/I, proprietary 4GLs like Focus, Natural, Informix 4GL) declined.
- Thousands of corporate IT staff who specialized in vendor-specific systems (IBM AS/400, Digital, Honeywell, Burroughs) were laid off as UNIX, C, C++, and later Java took over.
- Example: Manufacturing firms like GM and large airlines reduced RPG programmers in the late ’80s as AS/400 use shrank.
- Universities phased out teaching proprietary languages, making jobs for those specialists scarce.
1990s: Client-Server & PC Revolution
- Shift from mainframe programmers → client-server and PC developers
- IT departments downsized large mainframe teams, retraining or laying off staff.
- Microsoft Windows + Visual Basic, C++, and Oracle SQL systems displaced older COBOL teams.
- Example: State governments and U.S. federal agencies in the 1990s shifted to client-server apps, cutting thousands of government COBOL jobs.
Late 1990s–2000s: Y2K & Outsourcing
-
Post-Y2K COBOL layoffs
-
Massive hiring occurred before 2000 to fix COBOL date bugs. Afterward, many COBOL programmers were laid off once systems were patched.
-
Example: Insurance, banking, and federal government agencies shed thousands of temporary or contract COBOL programmers post-2000.
-
IT Outsourcing & Offshoring
-
Programming shifted to India and Eastern Europe.
-
U.S. and Western European corporations cut tens of thousands of in-house programmer jobs, particularly in legacy languages like COBOL and C, and even some C++/Java roles.
2000s: Internet & Open Source Revolution
-
Shift from desktop software → web development
-
Thousands of Visual Basic, Delphi, and PowerBuilder programmers faced obsolescence when web apps (HTML, Java, PHP, later JavaScript frameworks) became dominant.
-
Example: Many U.S. enterprise software consultancies downsized VB/Delphi programmers in the early 2000s.
-
Mainframe downsizing continues
-
Large banks and government agencies again cut staff as older systems were replaced or outsourced.
2010s: Cloud & Mobile Era
-
Shift from on-premise enterprise software → SaaS & Cloud
-
IT staff maintaining legacy enterprise apps were reduced, replaced by fewer cloud specialists.
-
Example: IBM, HP, and Oracle cut thousands of enterprise software and legacy system programmers as AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud spread.
-
Mobile-first app boom displacing desktop app developers
-
Many C++/Win32 and Flash programmers lost relevance as Android (Java/Kotlin) and iOS (Objective-C/Swift) dominated.
-
Adobe Flash end-of-life (2020) caused thousands of Flash/ActionScript developers worldwide to lose work almost overnight.
2020s: AI & Automation
- Automation of coding and DevOps
- Rise of GitHub Copilot, low-code/no-code platforms, and generative AI has already led to hiring slowdowns in entry-level programming. Some companies explicitly cut staff citing "efficiency gains" from AI.
- Example: 2023–2025 tech layoffs (Meta, Google, Microsoft, IBM) often mention AI-driven efficiency as a factor.
✅ Key Observations:
- Most layoffs weren’t because technology instantly killed jobs, but because organizations consolidated, outsourced, or retrained staff once a new dominant platform emerged.
- The largest direct layoffs tied to technological obsolescence were:
- Post-Y2K COBOL purge (2000)
- Offshoring wave (2000s)
- Flash deprecation (2010s)
- Cloud migration layoffs (2010s)
- AI efficiency layoffs (2020s)